The day before a lawsuit continues in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals questioning his eligibility as president, Obama announces that Osama Bin Laden was killed. Live updates of the 9th Circuit hearing can be had by clicking here.
Navy Seals deserve all the credit in this outcome source: navy.org
There are many accounts of how he was killed. Some news sources say that he was killed a week ago and the announcement was delayed in order to conduct conclusive DNA testing. Pretty much all accounts say there was a firefight of about 40 minutes where he was shot in the head. It turns out Bin Laden was hanging out in a “luxurious” compound about 800 yards next to a military academy in Pakistan. The academy has been compared to the equivalent of West Point in the United Sates.
With such a Navy Seals exercise and so much killing occurring, one wonders how news was kept quiet for a week pending DNA testing especially when this occurred a stone’s throw away from a military academy in Pakistan. The president works in mysterious ways.
At the same time within hours of Obama’s announcement of Osama’s death, a lawsuit continues at the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena questioning Obama’s eligibility. Don’t look for this anywhere in the news. There is a total media blackout on this event occurring today. We found this excerpt on a blog.
“Via Attorney Orly Taitz: I can’t believe it, but after 2 years of Obama litigation, for the first time the court of Appeals scheduled oral argument in Obama case. May 2, 9am, 9th circuit court of Appeals, Pasadena division, courtroom 1. This is Judge Carter case, where I represent Ambassador Alan Keyes, 10 state representatives and 30 members of U.S. military. More…
And there is more.
The President is appearing on Oprah again today. He taped the show April 27th but it happens to be appearing today May 2nd.
The timeline goes as follows. May 1st Osama Bin Laden announcement that he is dead. May 2nd oral arguments start in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena, California. TV crews we understand will be on hand to cover the court case. May 2nd the President goes on Oprah!
As we said the President works in mysterious ways. One thing we do know for sure. All the credit goes to the Navy Seals and to our Armed Services. The President’s teleprompter comes a distant second.
Tags: navy seals, Obama, Osama bin Laden, spotlight
About the Poster
Loading ...
That lawsuit will go no where. Stop grasping for straws. It must tick your naturalized citizen ass off knowing that Obama's CIA guys did a great job doing what Bush couldn't. In all fairness, Bush did a great job as our leader in the war on terror and Obama has followed thru with the same accord. Now stop reaching for something that isn't there and appreciate that Osama is dead.
I absolutely love that you are putting so much into Attorney Orly Taitz …I don't even have to work to prove you a skewed and uncredible source.
Did you read any of the courts decision concerning Barnett v. Obama?
Here are some interesting pieces from the decision as authored by Judge David O. Carter when he threw out the case:
Concerning Taitz's interpretation of "natural born citizen" (something neither of you are. So how can either of you interpret something neither of you have a personal knowledge of?):
"Plaintiffs presume that the words of Emmerich de Vattel, John Jay, and John Armor Bingham alone empower this Court to define the natural born citizen clause. The Complaint conveniently chooses to ignore Congress' long history of defining citizenship,whether naturalized or by birth."
On Taitz's argument that the Kenyan birth certificate (which has been proven false) should be taken as having more weight that Obama's legal short form:
"Plaintiffs appear to assume that should the Court receive a document from Kenya, the Court would give credence to this document over the American birth records of the President and the case would be resolved. Even should the Court permit the issuance of a letter rogatory to Kenya, the Court would still engage in a comparative exercise in which the records of America, which has historically maintained some of the most credible record keeping practices in the world, would be contrasted with the credibility of the records obtained from Kenya. Such an analysis would seemingly favor the records of the United States."
Concerning Taitz's conduct during the court proceedings:
"The hearings have been interesting to say the least. Plaintiffs' arguments through Taitz have generally failed to aid the Court. Instead, Plaintiffs' counsel has favored rhetoric seeking to arouse the emotions and prejudices of her followers rather than the language of a lawyer seeking to present arguments through cogent legal reasoning. While the Court has no desire to chill Plaintiffs' enthusiastic presentation, Taitz's argument often hampered the efforts of her co-counsel Gary Kreep ("Kreep"), counsel for Plaintiffs Drake and Robinson, to bring serious issues before the Court. The Court has attempted to give Plaintiffs a voice and a chance to be heard by respecting their choice of counsel and by making every effort to discern the legal arguments of Plaintiffs' counsel amongst the rhetoric."
"This Court exercised extreme patience when Taitz endangered this case being heard at allby failing to properly file and serve the complaint upon Defendants and held multiple hearings to ensure that the case would not be dismissed on the technicality of failure to effect service. While the original complaint in this matter was filed on January 20, 2009, Defendants were not properly served until August 25, 2009. Taitz successfully served Defendants only after the Court intervened on several occasions and requested that defense counsel make significant accommodations for her to effect service. Taitz also continually refused to comply with court rules and procedure. Taitz even asked this Court to recuse Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato on the basis that he required her to comply with the Local Rules… Taitz also attempted to dismiss two of her clients against their wishes because she did not want to work with their new counsel."
"Taitz encouraged her supporters to contact this Court, both via letters and phone calls. It was improper and unethical for her as an attorney to encourage her supporters to attempt to influence this Court's decision. Despite these attempts to manipulate this Court, the Court has not considered any outside pleas to influence the Court's decision."
"Additionally, the Court has received several sworn affidavits that Taitz asked potential witnesses that she planned to call before this Court to perjure themselves. This Court is deeply concerned that Taitz may have suborned perjury through witnesses she intended to bring before this Court."
And finally on Taitz's attack on the courts and the Judges themselves:
"Plaintiffs have encouraged the Court to ignore these mandates of the Constitution; to disregard the limits on its power put in place by the Constitution; and to effectively overthrow a sitting president who was popularly elected by "We the People"-over sixty-nine million of the people. Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this Court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism."
Please, please, please….I beg you Gil Guignat, please keep supporting this woman. Please keep pushing her nutty agenda.