I am a Conservative and Here is Why I Oppose Betsy DeVos

Education Secretary-designate Betsy DeVos testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 17, 2017, at her confirmation hearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

Earlier today, Betsy DeVos was officially confirmed as the next Secretary of Education in a historic tie breaking vote by Vice President Pence. Republicans everywhere are rejoicing in the glory that another one of President Trump’s nominees have been cleared. I, on the other hand, am not.

I have been one of the most vocal and avid supporters of the Trump Campaign, and now, the Trump Administration but I refuse to be a yes woman to the administration. The accountability of the Trump Administration takes precedence over my support for them. Betsy DeVos is a poor choice for the Secretary of Education and I feel it imperative to explain why.

First and foremost, DeVos is a poor choice to lead the Department of Education because there should be no Department of Education. Under the constitution, there is no legal basis for a Department of Education at the federal level. As in 1979, when the department was established, it is unconstitutional in the eyes of those who fight for the liberty of the American people. To give the federal government power over our schools and our children is the antithesis of what we believe as conservatives and constitutionalists. It is an unnecessary and illegal federal bureaucratic intrusion into local affairs. The 10th amendment gives control of education, amongst other things, to the state and local governments. The federal government is unconstitutionally involved in education and has been since the Carter Administration. The first step to solving education is to eliminate the unconstitutional Department of Education.

According to the Department of Education’s website, their purpose is to “establish policy for, administer and coordinate most federal assistance to education, collect data on US schools, and to enforce federal educational laws regarding privacy and civil rights.”

Donald Trump, during his campaign, promised to cut the Department of Education in its entirety. The only good appointment to head the Department of Education is someone who is prepared to work themselves out of a job. The appointment of DeVos is a broken promise to the American people. DeVos clearly stated in her confirmation hearings she plans to enforce the mandates from ESSA making it evident she has no intention of eliminating the Department of Education.

Betsy DeVos believes strongly in school choice, but school choice is no choice. When it comes to school choice, students receive vouchers, also referred to as opportunity scholarships, which are state-funded scholarships parents can use to send their child to a charter or private school, for rather than public school. Private schools must meet minimum standards established by legislatures in order to accept voucher recipients. This means when the federal money follows the child through vouchers, the liberty is taken from the that school, and given right back to the federal government. Most traditional public schools are run by a school board made up of duly-elected members from the community. The school board is accountable to the community it serves. Locally elected school boards are the voice of the people they serve. Without locally elected school boards, the taxpayers is no longer represented. It is truly taxation without representation. This is not the case for voucher or charter schools. Charters are run by appointed boards and committees that are not accountable to parents and the taxpayer. When parents are unhappy with their public school, they can organize, vote for new leadership or even take a leadership role, themselves. When parents are unhappy with their  charter or voucher school, they have been silenced. They have no elected representation.

Pundits and profiteers love to spout rhetoric about how well charter schools teach kids. But there is zero evidence to back up that claim. That is a marketing tactic. It’s like when you’re in a bad neighborhood and walk past a dive that claims to have the best cup of coffee in the city. Will you actually get the best cup of coffee? Maybe… But probably not. Surely, some charter schools do exceptionally well. However, most charters and almost all cyber charters do perform below that of their public school counterparts.

We have real problems. Over half of public school students are living below the poverty line. They are already several grade levels behind their non-impoverished peers before they even enter kindergarten. We need to invest our time, energy, and resources into things that combat this – tutoring, counseling, wraparound services, proper nutrition, etc. The predicament is even more complicated by the way schools receive funding. Throughout the country, poor districts get less money than the wealthy and even middle class ones. The students who go to these schools are systematically being cheated out of resources and opportunities. And instead of helping them, we are playing a shell game with charter and voucher schools. The problem isn’t that parents don’t have several excellent choices. If they’re poor, they often don’t have one and school choice is not supported by grassroots movements, it is supported by billionaires.

The idea of school choice a lot like socialism — it sounds good in theory, but it doesn’t work. By granting certain students admission into “better” schools, we are ignoring the bigger problem and its a zero sum game. This is very simple to understand. Usually when something seems too good to be true, it probably is.

If we really want to ensure every child in this country gets an excellent education, the answer isn’t school choice. Instead, we need to commit to supporting our public school system. We all need to be in this together. Yes, our schools should look at the needs of each child and tailor education to fit appropriately. But that shouldn’t be done in parallel school systems. It should be done under the same umbrella. That way, you can’t defund and defraud one without hurting all. It can’t just be about your child. It has to be about all children. That’s the only choice worth making.

School choice is no choice when the money follows the child.


Previous articleWATCH: Nancy Pelosi Calls President Trump “President Bush”
Next articleVirginia Baptist Leaders Busy Betraying Their Base
Kayla Adanalian is a young conservative who believes strongly in defending liberty, the importance of the traditional family, and the value of maintaining the appreciation of a strong male role in society. From a young female’s perspective, she is dedicated to defeating and exposing the lies put forth by modern feminists and the threat they pose to the break down of traditional ideals. Kayla is a recent college graduate from DeSales University with a degree in Finance. She is a writer, radio show host and political commentator. Kayla is a former college athlete who was born in Fresno, California, but was raised at West Point, NY by her aunt and uncle who instilled in her the Catholic and conservative values she says she strives to live by daily. Kayla has been published by Western Journalism and is a regular contributor for drrichswier.com as well as rednationrising.us where she is a writer and editor. She is also a strong pro-life advocate and has been featured in Live Action News’ Advocate Spotlight for her work in giving a voice to those who don’t have one.


  1. Kayla, thanks for your comments they were very informative. This is the first I’ve heard your view that the department is unconstitutional. Please send your views to the new Secretary so she can have this information to help with her decisions. I cannot comment on your facts since i do not know much about this issue, however i really feel you have an excellent point. Please share it.