Cornucopia of Corruption In Global Warming Promotion

0
363
051122-N-3188P-001 Jacksonville, Fla. (Nov. 22, 2005) - Culinary Specialist 2nd Class Linda Ostler prepares a cornucopia for the Thanksgiving meal at the galley on board Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Fla. U.S. Navy photo by Photographer's Mate 2nd Class Jamar X Perry (RELEASED)

The Global Warming “Cornucopia of Corruption.”

We can’t say Global Warming is a pack of lies, without proving a giant network of liars to support it, and a clear reward system to tell the lies.  Motive and method must be shown.

So, I had to challenge myself to provide reasonable evidence of massive lying up and down the line, from voters to scientists to leaders.

Notice all the levels of confirmed existence of either lies, or behavior 100% consistent with liar’s behaviors.  It’s like a cornucopia, with levels of corruption piled on top of each other.

  • Citizen level – Widespread appearance of “Alinsky” tactics on social media. No liberals would debate me on Global Warming, out of thousands I challenged – when I demanded the rules limit to using only proven facts.   None would discuss how easy it is to manipulate the math which reduced millions of measurements down to one number – indeed they did not want to discuss this obvious source of error and deception.
  • Citizen level – These 3 beliefs are highly correlated: socialism, globalism and global warming.   It appears as 100% politically aligned, and thus is politically driven, not scientifically driven.
  • Party level – Democratic leaders are clearly PROVEN liars, not just accused liars, about spending, benefits, racism, education, protecting women in the workplace, Russian collusion among Republics, hiding Russian collusion with Hillary Foundation….
  • Ideological level: Socialism is well established as an agenda-driven ideology, not known for “science breakthroughs.”
  • Ideology level – Socialism is known to decay into mass lies, US kids were taught this history of lying in high school for decades.
  • Scientist level – $200k per year for 200 scientists to “prove” theory, will spawn 200 affirmative findings. True science would pay half the scientists to find the flaws in the theory, as they do in a thesis review, not dig up more agreeable data.
  • Scientist level – A theory is that which is UNPROVEN, so the scientists are evangelizing policy based on guesswork and hearsay, until proven.
  • Leadership level – Al Gore propaganda videos and UN money flows. UN official calls it an “economic program” at a live event – “to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years.”
  • Leadership level – They changed the name from “global warming” to “climate change” when their acclaimed “certain prediction” never manifested, it turned out to be a false prediction, proof of error. That’s “bait and switch” deception.
  • Rewards level – Big dollar rewards from leftist governments are provided to “prove the theory,” not to find flaws, like a typical theory undergoes.   Theories are always bolstered by finding the worst flaws – not looking for data which agrees with the proposed theory.
  • Mathematics level:  An “average” temperature is NOT a fact, it is a statistic.  “Average” can be calculated in a myriad of ways – weighted, center-weighted, normalized, etc.   The left has been lying to it’s followers by claiming an average is a fact.
  • Mathematics level:  When data is missing from the measurement of inputs, estimating the values of the missing data is performed.  The creates errors in the average.
  • Mathematics level:  Numerous whistle blowers have pointed out estimated data values are always biased higher, a sign of investigative bias.

Summary

As you can see, the motives, rewards, communication methods, and con men leaders are in place to promote a phalanx of lies about something which cannot be proven:  The “average temperature” of the earth.

Another Recent Proof of Failure

“And the winner is Scenario C. Global surface temperature has not increased significantly since 2000, discounting the larger-than-usual El Niño of 2015-16. Assessed by Mr. Hansen’s model, surface temperatures are behaving as if we had capped 18 years ago the carbon-dioxide emissions responsible for the enhanced greenhouse effect.

But we didn’t.”

https://www.wsj.com/articles/thirty-years-on-how-well-do-global-warming-predictions-stand-up-1529623442

SHARE
Previous articleWith Every Generation Comes The Pop
Next articleFrom The Mind of a Dumb Ole Biker From Alvin, Texas
John Lofgren spent over 10 years researching US economic history, identifying best practices, and exposing findings in public forums in researching his well reviewed book, "Atlas Shouts". John earned degrees from the University of Florida and the University of Central Florida. A computer engineer, he holds five patents and has thirty years of design experience in electronics and design automation. He is also an accomplished lead singer and guitarist in a Motown/Classic Rock band.

LEAVE A REPLY