He lied, he smirked, and he smugly testified about certain “off the cuff” texts he doesn’t remember writing but still explained what the texts meant. He denied that his personal anti-Trump bias affected his work because he said the texts were sent out of his “deep sense of patriotism” and nothing else.
And so F.B.I. Counter-Intelligence Agent Peter Strzok, who publicly testified last Thursday before the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees, tried to paint himself as the victim of a vast Republican conspiracy that claimed his personal bias and texts against then-candidate Donald Trump affected how he did his job in regards to his involvement in both the F.B.I.’s Hillary Clinton email investigation and Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible Russian collusion and election tampering. Going so far as to say that the hearing itself was but a rehash of Hillary’s emails and yet “another victory notch” for Vladimir Putin, Strzok insisted that his text messages regarding Hillary and Trump were nothing but “standard political opinions” that he was entitled to hold under the First Amendment. And he did so while insisting that his promise to former F.B.I. lawyer Lisa Page…whom he was having an affair with…that “we’ll find a way to stop Mr. Trump” did not mean he was biased in his approach to his job.
And we say that is simply not so for not only did he clearly show bias but more importantly his words exposed one Mr. Peter Strzok for who he really is…Obama’s ‘deep state’ operative planted within the F.B.I. itself. And how did we come to this conclusion…by putting the pieces of the puzzle together so that when fully assembled a vastly different picture of Strzok emerged then just the arrogant individual who tried to downplay the seriousness of this hearing, but who in that arrogance proved himself to be the one who at the very least helped or who actually orchestrated this entire sorted mess.
Let’s start putting the puzzle together with the one question that never has been asked let alone answered…how did Peter Strzok ever become part of either James Comey’s email investigative team or Robert Mueller’s supposedly unbiased and supposedly nonpartisan investigation into supposed Russian collusion when it had been known for years how Strzok felt about both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, after all he texted back then as much if not more so than Trump does now.
The answer to that critical question is that for the most part Robert Mueller’s investigators were and still remain Democrat party loyalists and donors to both Hillary Clinton and Barack HUSSEIN Obama with non-partisanship never being a pre-requisite for being on his team. And the same surely goes for those James Comey handpicked to investigate Hillary’s emails. In fact, party partisanship seems to have been the one critical thing both Comey and Mueller demanded of all those on their teams as everything that had been so carefully planned and very calculatingly crafted to make sure Obama via Hillary Clinton got his third term in office, needed folks willing to cover up both investigations and to made it to look like Trump was guilty of collusion on the outside chance he won the election.
And Peter Strzok in his unabashed hatred of Donald Trump and love for Hillary Clinton fit both bills to a tee.
But the thing is Robert Mueller…a man who himself was not and is not impartial no matter the R next to his name…no matter that he in a ‘too little-too late’ move did in 2017 remove Strzok from his investigative team when he found out about the texts…and James Comey…a Rino Obama puppet-on-a-string…were never the ones calling the shots…Peter Strzok was and still is and certain of his text messages prove just that.
But first Robert Mueller and James Comey. In Mueller’s case, if this man had been truly impartial and if he was truly dedicated to ascertaining the truth about supposed Trump/Russian collusion and not just focusing on the appearance of integrity, he would have disbanded his team and called for the investigation to be closed when back in March, Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee announced that their in-depth investigation had found no evidence whatsoever of collusion between Donald J. Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia’s wanting to sway the 2016 election. Yet Mueller’s investigation continued on with the grand climax reached last Friday night, when on the eve of the Trump/Putin Helsinki Summit, Mueller’s flunkie Rod Rosenstein…whom the House Republicans now want impeached…announced that 12 Russians were being indicted for hacking not into Trump’s campaign computers but those of the DNC…unsecured DNC computers in fact…computers the DNC had never even turned over to the F.B.I…how convenient yet questionable is that.
Talk about timing…talk about a diversion to deflect us away from Peter Strzok’s public testimony completed literally mere hours before…for suddenly now just as the all-important meeting between the leaders of the world’s two superpowers is to take place, the Mueller investigation is completed, the Russians are guilty, the Democrats demand the summit be called off, and Hillary Clinton is now trying to set the stage for her third presidential run.
Such orchestrated theatrics even a blind man could see as this reeks of nothing but desperation and a need to hide secrets hidden within the F.B.I. that as we suspected reach all the way back to the Obama White House.
And those secrets lead back to then-F.B.I. Director James Comey’s investigation into Hillary’s emails and raise serious questions about the F.B.I.’s integrity during this period, including their handling of a proven to be manufactured dossier and an intended scenario where Hillary is to be the aggrieved one instead of the guilty party that she was.
Comey already knew there was evidence of collusion not between Trump and Russia but between senior bureau officials and Hillary when he was told to change the wording of the F.B.I.’s findings from Hillary being guilty of “gross negligence”…a serious chargeable offense…to being just “extremely careless” regarding the emails sent from her unsecured private email server. But the thing is it was not James Comey who actually physically changed the wording of the report…it was changed by Peter Strzok and done so on his F.B.I. computer.
Secrets indeed for what appears on the surface is not always the case for James Comey…the very man who exonerated Hillary even before interviewing her…was but collateral damage easily thrown away with Loretta Lynch just the courier of the much needed offense change. And Rod Rosenstein was actually Comey’s handler not the other way around with Peter Strzok being and remaining the ‘deep state’ direct conduit to Obama and who on Obama’s directions actually on the surface was the one calling all the shots. And Strzok knew well that if he was caught Obama would make sure he would walk away with but a slap on the wrist if even that.
And while you will say this is just supposition on our part, we say it was Peter Strzok and his unabashed arrogance…an arrogance rivaling that of Obama….who gave it all away with his back and forth text messages to Lisa Page.
“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” was Peter Strzok’s reply…leaving one to wonder just who “we” is and how exactly did “we” intend to “stop” Trump from becoming president.
“We” is a term used to encompass others besides oneself and “we” also alludes to someone being the leader of “we.” And with Strzok’s arrogance and self-assured smugness a sure sign of someone trusted to be in command it can safely be assumed that he was the front-man of that texted “we.” But while Strzok was the front-man what with his job being to make sure Hillary became Obama’s third term in office, this means both Obama and Hillary were surely part of that “we” with James Comey thrown in for good measure. And why so…a weak and easily manipulated man was needed to assure that Hillary was found not guilty of “gross negligence,” and with the always hovering threat of sudden “suicide” always hanging over one’s head when one gets involved with the Clinton’s, Comey fit that description to a tee.
As for Obama and Hillary being part of the “we”…it is a fact that when someone has both the most to gain as well as the most to lose that someone will do everything in their power to assure themselves the win. Losing is not an option for losing can have serious consequences, and losing the White House was a consequence both Obama and Hillary had to avoid at all costs so as not to upset their respective handlers and so on up the chain of the oh so dubious command…or should we say cabal.
So while we’ve laid out the “we” aspect of Strzok’s inflammatory text what about the word “stop”…a word just as inflammatory and maybe even more so for “stop” usually means put an end to something.
Could “stop” simply have meant “stop” Trump at the ballot box, something Peter Strzok would like us to believe and something we hope would be the case or could it have meant “stop” as in Vince Foster, James McDougal, Mary Mahoney, Seth Rich, and so many others…for when anything Clinton is involved one just never knows. It’s an unanswerable question at this point in time but a question that simply cannot be dismissed for when hate and the quest for power are the driving forces of one’s actions no scenario should be taken off the table.
So how did Strzok’s testimony play out with both Republicans and Democrats?
Republicans hit Strzok hard demanding answers they knew they would not get from a man obviously on a divert and deflect everything back to Trump mission, while Democrats were lined up in lockstep to applaud and defend this “renegade F.B.I. agent” whom the agency itself now seems ready to distance themselves from.
Taking no nonsense from obviously scripted Peter Strzok whose pat answer to the questions he did not want to answer always being, “I understand your question and would like to answer. As you know, the counsel of the FBI have directed me not to answer any questions about any questions about ongoing investigations,” now saw House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy nailing Strzok on his “self-serving definition of bias,” the very word he had trouble defining during his previous deposition behind closed doors. Saying that Strzok had Clinton winning the White House even before the election took place, Gowdy added that once Trump won and Mueller was tasked with an investigation that never should have been, “Agent Strzok had Donald Trump impeached before he even started investigating him. That is bias. Agent Strzok may not see it but the rest of the country does, and it is not what we want, expect or deserve from any law enforcement officer much less the FBI.”
And bias is the crux of the matter for without bias there would have been none of our hard-earned taxpayer dollars wasted on a cast of characters we already knew were corrupted to their very core.
And then there was House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte (R., Va.) who actually read off some of Strzok’s biased text messages sent to Lisa Page.
“To my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, please replace President Trump’s name with your own name in a small sample of things Mr. Strzok has said,” Goodlatte said. “Envision how you would feel if you found out that the chief agent investigating you as a Member of Congress was making these comments: ‘F Trump,’ ‘Trump is a disaster,’ ‘Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. I could SMELL the Trump support’ — or, perhaps most alarmingly and revealingly, ‘We’ll stop it’ — referring directly to Mr. Trump’s candidacy for President.”
If that’s not bias we don’t know what is…and we’ll go into more detail on bias in a bit.
And the Democrats response…the one that stands out in our minds the most is how Rep. Steve Cohen (TN.) had the audacity to tell Peter Strzok that he deserved a Purple Heart for sitting through a public hearing that was “an attack on you and a way to attack [Special Counsel Robert] Mueller and the investigation that is to get at Russian collusion involved in our elections, which is what this committee should be looking at.” Amazing isn’t it.
And to Rep. Cohen we say this never was an investigation into Russian collusion, it was and remains a hearing regarding bias, lies, and cover-ups being perpetrated by one Peter Strzok who still is trying to make an innocent man…Donald J. Trump…the guilty party in an election your side lost. And might we add how dare you defame our troops and veterans by equating the giving of the Purple Heart to this scum when the Purple Heart is given solely to whom while wearing our nation’s uniform gets injured or killed during times of war.
It’s sad just how low the Democrats will sink when therapy puppies and bottles of bubbles are simply not enough to soothe their bruised egos.
And while the congressional hearings last week featuring Strozk failed to reveal any information we didn’t already know, it did succeed in shining the light of truth in the court of public opinion on Strzok and the ‘suits’ at the F.B.I. Whether or not the IG found bias on the part of Comey or McCabe, he did find bias in Strzok regardless of how much Strzok protested in that ten-hour hearing. That bias was two-fold…bias against Donald Trump and bias in favor of Hillary Clinton.
According to Strzok, as per his under oath sworn testimony, “I did not think that bias was expressed in those text messages.” According to the Justice Department’s Office of Inspector General report however, Strzok’s texts were evidence of a “biased state of mind.”
It is hard if not impossible for anyone with even the most basic amount of common sense to believe that Strzok, showing such a deep desire to see Hillary win and stop Trump…as evidenced by his own texts…could keep it personal without allowing it to directly affect his work in both investigations.
Nobody who was going at those investigations with the open mind Strozk claimed he had during his sworn testimony last week would have written a text stating his “concern” that there wasn’t any “there, there” with regard to collusion between Trump and the Russians. An open-minded individual, one without bias, would have said if there’s no “there, there,” Trump didn’t do it and the case should be closed…but Strzok texted that he was very “concerned” there was no “there, there.” Concerned, as in if there wasn’t any “there, there,” they couldn’t stop Trump…couldn’t impeach Trump…couldn’t nail Trump…and Hillary could possibly lose the election.
Again, according to the official IG report, with regard to the aforementioned “…we’ll stop it” text, “It is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the [Anthony] Weiner laptop in October 2016, these text messages led us to conclude that we did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision was free from bias.”
Allow us to be clear here, Strzok’s clear bias was exactly what the F.B.I. ‘suits’ Comey and McCabe relied upon in both those investigations…it is exactly what Hillary and her team, including the DNC, relied upon and perhaps even more precisely it was what Obama relied upon as an “insurance policy” if you will, yet but another direct reference to yet another of Strzok’s texts, in order to secure what we previously stated would have been his third term using Hillary as a figurehead.
During his testimony last week Strzok stated, “Let me be clear, unequivocally and under oath: not once in my 26 years of defending my nation did my personal opinions impact any official action I took.” Trey Gowdy had no trouble seeing through the flimsy facade and stated that Strzok had a “self-serving definition of bias.”
The bias displayed either overtly by Peter Strzok, or covertly by F.B.I. ‘suits’ Comey and McCabe along with the smirking, arrogant testimony provided by Strzok last week in that congressional hearing have now become the public persona of the FBI thanks to Obama and Hillary and has resulted in the American public having as little trust in the Bureau as we do in the IRS.
The last thing America wants or needs is a sense of distrust in the nation’s top law enforcement agency, the F.B.I. but thanks to the main players…Obama, Hillary, Comey, McCabe, Page, and especially Strzok…that is exactly what we now have.
At this point, we must differentiate between the F.B.I.’s ‘boots’ and ‘suits.’ While the ‘boots’ on the ground for the F.B.I. are not to be blamed in all of this, it is exactly those everyday agents of the Bureau who will ultimately pay the price for what the Bureau’s ‘suits’ have done.
Like it or not the faces of the F.B.I. are now Strzok, his lover Lisa Page, and the former top two ‘suits’ Comey and McCabe, but worse yet than just being the now publicly disgraced and most recognizable names and faces of the F.B.I., those four are what the public now views as the standard.
Obama led this now public perception of the F.B.I. by orchestrating the use of our nation’s primary law enforcement agency as a political weapon to be used not only in the attempted smear of then candidate and now President Donald Trump, but also for the purpose of covering up Hillary’s own malfeasance.
Hillary’s role on the public perception downfall of the F.B.I. is equally as deep and troubling as she and her campaign along with the DNC provided a major part of the financing for the now completely discredited Steele dossier that manufactured dirt against Trump and was used to illegally garner FISA warrants.
Comey, although a useful puppet, also kept the manufacturing of the Steele dossier going by using F.B.I. resources to continue financing it even though he had no way of vetting whether or not any of the material contained within it was credible…which it wasn’t.
McCabe knew exactly what was going on regarding the manufactured dossier, as well as knowing the true purpose of both going after Trump with it and the slow walking of evidence against Hillary Clinton. After all, it was primarily McCabe who kept Obama up to speed as the duel campaigns of smears against Trump and the covering up on Hillary’s behalf went along.
Lisa Page was the F.B.I. attorney whose job could well have been to safeguard both ends of the “elect Hillary at any cost” covert operation against being discovered, or if it was discovered, to bury any strings that could be pulled in legalities. Make no mistake, she was just as in on it as were the others.
That leaves us with Peter Strzok, the one we call the “evil genius” of the operation. Obama knew and most likely related to McCabe and Comey that the F.B.I. would need a point person for the operations…smearing Trump via an official F.B.I. investigation so as to ruin him in the court of public opinion leading up to the 2016 election, and a point man to slow walk any elements of the investigation into Hillary such as the Weiner laptop issue, and exonerate Hillary ahead of the election even if the investigation was still ongoing.
They needed someone brash, arrogant, dedicated to Hillary and just as dedicated against Trump, and someone who would no doubt see such an opportunity as a big step from being a ‘boot’ to becoming a ‘suit.’
Strzok’s arrogance, combined with his ambition became not only his downfall, but the F.B.I.’s downfall as well. Strzok’s texts between himself and Page were arrogant, vile, vulgar and showed an overwhelming bias not only on his part, but on the part of the F.B.I. ‘suits’ who engineered the entire weaponization of the Bureau against a presidential candidate and then against a sitting U.S. President.
With Comey and McCabe now gone from the F.B.I. and with both Lisa Page and Strzok now investigative targets themselves, it has fallen to Robert Mueller to try and keep the covert operation alive through the still ongoing investigation into non-existent collusion between now President Trump and the Russians.
Stopping Trump…that was Strzok’s goal, as per his text to Lisa Page…because that was the goal of the ‘suits’ at the FBI…Comey and McCabe as directed by Hillary and Obama…to stop Trump, and if he…Peter Strzok could be the one to stop Trump, and oversee the exoneration of Hillary…from ‘boot’ to ‘suit’ he would go in a flash.
At one point Strzok texted his lover Lisa Page that he was, “concerned” that there was no “there, there” with regard to the manufactured Trump/Russian collusion investigation. Strzok’s “concern” was without a “there, there,” he wouldn’t become the suit his ambition and arrogance had led him to believe was his destiny.
Rightly or wrongly the perception of the F.B.I. is no longer that of being above reproach, but now beneath contempt and Strzok’s arrogance in last week’s hearing did even more harm than his texts. Liberals in that hearing also made things worse…not only for the F.B.I. but for themselves by defending Strzok and attempting to turn him into some sort of a hero worthy of a Purple Heart, and in defending Strzok, liberals were, by proxy, defending the ‘suits’ at the F.B.I.
At the heart of the now damaged reputation of the F.B.I. is Obama and Hillary who weaponized our nation’s top law enforcement agency just as Obama had weaponized the IRS…both being utilized as political weapons.
The ultimate irony might well be that to cook up a fictitious story of collusion between then-candidate and now President Trump and the Russians, Obama had to turn the F.B.I. into his and Hillary’s version of the KGB.
Sadly, aside from a few firings, and we believe that Peter Strzok will be fired from the F.B.I. shortly, the rest of the usual suspects will get away with undermining what was once the most trusted law enforcement agency in the United States, as congressional Republicans simply do not have the guts to do what’s right.
It will take decades to reestablish the factor of trust lost to the political weaponizing of the F.B.I., and we suspect that what we know now of the situation may well be just the tip of the proverbial iceberg. This goes well beyond the swamp and is deeply rooted on deep state tactics, meaning there could well be much more to it with many more operatives involved than we know of at this point.
The puzzle pieces have now all been assembled and the picture as you can see is not a pretty one with liberals claiming as their heroes those who have so tarnished our nation’s belief that the law would be evenly applied with their sneering, smirking, astoundingly arrogant and disdainful, vile and vulgar disrespect of not only our President but of those who believe America can and will be great again.
Their attitudes and actions will serve our conservative cause well in upcoming elections as we will surely neither forget nor forgive.
By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio
Copyright © 2018 Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots / Investigative Reports / All rights reserved.
Today, Friday, July 20th from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss their Special Investigative Report: ‘Peter Strzok…the Epitome of Arrogance and Bias’; and important news of the day.
Hope you can tune in at:http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history